Tuesday, November 8, 2022

Breakfast Similarity

The Theory of Breakfast Similarity states that: "Although most people want variety in their midday and evening meals, for breakfast they are content to eat the same thing day after day after day after day after day."

From a survey conducted by mini-AIR, which asked: Do you like to eat the same thing for breakfast day after day after day after day after day?


The result:

YES 52%

NO 47%


NOTE: 7% of "YES" respondents, and, oddly, the same percentage of "NO" respondents specified that their answer applies only to weekdays, and that for them the opposite answer applied to weekends. Several individuals sent in insightful observations, and a few others sent in observational insights. Here are a few of each:


"Yes. Since without a breakfast most people have a limited ability to think (at least I have), it is too hard a challenge to think up some nice meal early in the morning. It is thus logical that most people rely on food that has proven itself in the morning as the best strategy to getting booted up quickly." (Investigator Ferdinand Peper)


"Your question confuses what we like with what we do. Do I like to eat the same thing for breakfast day after day? No. Do I eat the same thing for breakfast day after day? Yes." (Investigator Marc Auslander)


"Cooked rolled outs with dried fruit, nuts, bran and acidopholus yoghurt, topped with 'single malt' honey from the Leatherwood tree (endemic to Tasmania -- the worlds greatest honey) for 25 years and counting." (Investigator Simon Baker)


"I do not like to eat the same thing for breakfast day after day after day after day after day. But I do like to eat the same thing for breakfast day after day after day after day. (There are, after all, limits.)" (Investigator Leslie Lamport)



from:

mini-Annals of Improbable Research ("mini-AIR")

Issue Number 2003-10  October, 2003

Einstein's Co-author: A cautionary tale for science editors


Among the many notable achievements of Einstein's work, was the discovery of his coworker in Berlin, S.B. Preuss, though it received little publicity.

A review article about cosmology stated: "The discovery ... of Hubble's law ... led Einstein to ... reject the notorious cosmological term (Einstein and Preuss, 1931)".

The curious reader who has followed Einstein's life story and knows of his collaborations with M. Grossman, J. Grommer and W. Mayer (to name a few), but who has never heard of Preuss, eagerly turns to the references given. It is: A. Einstein and Preuss, S.B. (1931), _Akad. Wiss._, 235. Surely the _Akad. Wiss._ must be the Berlin Academy? Happily enough for those without access to the originals, Einstein's reports to the Berlin Academy were reproduced on the occasion of celebrations of Einstein's 100th birthday in 1979. A glance at the appropriate page of the 1931 volume of the _Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften_ (Reports of the meetings of the Prussian Academy of Science) reveals the workings of a creative mind. Let us look at the following sequence of references:

Einstein, A. (1931). _Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss._ ...
A. Einstein, 1931, _Sitzgsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss._ ...
A. Einstein, _Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss._ ... (1931)
A. Einstein (1931) _Sber. preuss. Akad. Wiss._ ...
Einstein, A., 1931, S.B. Preuss. _Akad. Wiss._ ...
A. Einstein, S.B. Preuss, _Akad. Wiss._, 1931 ...
A. Einstein, S.B. Preuss, _Akad. Wiss._ (1931) ...
A. Einstein and Preuss, S.B. (1931) _Akad. Wiss._ ...

Thus, it turns out that the birth and death of S.B. Preuss occurred within such a very short time span that any scientific endeavors attempted could come to nothing. One hopes that this will be noticed by the people producing the citation index. Otherwise, in a generation or two, a young historian of science might apply for a grant to uncover more details from the brief, but not entirely joyless, life of S.B. Preuss.


Source: "Droll Science," an anthology compiled by Robert L. Weber